Search Results for "Railway Protection Force Rules"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Juvenile Cannot File Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC; Remedy Lies Under Juvenile Justice Act. The JJ Act is a complete code providing for bail provisions for children in conflict with law, and Section 438 CrPC is not available to them.

The case involved a reference to a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court to decide whether a juvenile in conflict with law can file an application f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Metro Construction Proposal to Central Empowered Committee for Forest Land Scrutiny. DMRC's Application for Declaration of Non-Forest Areas Deferred Pending Examination Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Related Environmental Statutes.

The Supreme Court, in its original jurisdiction, considered multiple interlocutory applications (IAs) filed in the long-pending writ petition concerni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Railway Employee Against CAT Order Dismissing Pension Claim on Limitation. Delay Caused by Employer's Criminal Negligence Cannot Bar Substantive Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath Nathoo Bari, a retired Junior Clerk of the Chief Security Commissioner's Office, Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Railway Employee Challenging CAT Order Dismissing Pension Claim on Limitation Grounds. Delay Caused by Respondent's Negligence Cannot Bar Substantive Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath Nathoo Bari, a retired Junior Clerk of the Chief Security Commissioner's Office, Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a writ ...