Search Results for "RSA Section 100"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Plaintiff failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arises from a suit for declaration and injunction filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular Second Appeal in Adoption Dispute — Reverses Appellate Court's Finding of Adoption. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove valid adoption under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, as essential ceremonies of giving and taking were not established.

The present regular second appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the defendant, assailing the judgment and decree of the appellate court wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Half Share in Joint Family Properties Dismissed as Appellant Failed to Prove Substantial Question of Law.

The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her half share in the suit schedule properties against the appellant-de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement of Sale Proved by Attesting Witness and Part Performance Established, No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Muktumhussain Mehaboob Sab Bapunavar, was the fourth defendant in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale filed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Appellant Entitled to Redemption Despite Delay. Court holds that a mortgagor's right to redeem continues until foreclosure or sale, and mere delay does not extinguish the right unless there is a decree for foreclosure.

The present appeal arises from a suit for redemption of mortgage filed by the appellant (plaintiff No.2) along with respondent No.2 (plaintiff No.1) a...