Search Results for "Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction of Property Under MPID Act — Petitioner Cannot Challenge Auction After Being Declared Successful Bidder. Court Held That Petitioner's Own Conduct of Participating in Auction with Knowledge of Attachments and Seeking Specific Performance Before MPID Court Precludes Challenge Under Article 226.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Lemon Seeds Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

5 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Execution — Consent Decree Not a Nullity Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That Undertakings Given to Court Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn and Execution Proceedings Are Continuation of Suit.

13 Jul 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the original Judgment Debtor No.2 (Firoz A Nadiadwala) and his proprietary firm Base Industries Group see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Conditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit Based on Dishonoured Cheque — Reduces Deposit Amount from Full Cheque Value to 50%. The court held that a triable defence of blank cheque issuance warrants a less onerous condition for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC and Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

11 Jun 2018

The case arises from a Commercial Summary Suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff (Motilal Laxmichand Salecha HUF) against the appellant/defendant (Mou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Loan Amount. Plaintiff entitled to decree for Rs.1.65 Crores with interest as defendant failed to raise a triable issue under Order XXXVII CPC.

31 Oct 2017

The plaintiff, Tradelink Exim (India) Pvt Ltd, filed a Commercial Suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Money Lending Licence Renewal Case — Subsequent Renewal Covering Loan Date is Sufficient Compliance. Licence under Bombay Money Lenders Act need not be obtained before advancing loan if renewal subsequently covers the date of advancement.

2 Mar 2016

The appellant, Hind Finance Industries and Investment Limited, filed a second appeal against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and first app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Loan Recovery — Bombay Money Lenders Act Defence Rejected as Suit Based on Negotiable Instruments. The court held that the suit based on cheques and bills of exchange is not barred under the Bombay Money Lenders Act, 1946, and the appellant must deposit the principal amount of Rs.67 crores as a condition for leave to defend.

20 Nov 2014

The appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge granting the appellant (original defendant) leave to defend the summary suit conditional u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Partnership Dispute — Unregistered Partnership Bar Under Section 69(2A) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Applies to Suit for Accounts and Dissolution. The court held that the trial court must frame and decide the preliminary issue of maintainability under Section 69(2A) before proceeding with the suit.

11 Jul 2011

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the plaintiff (Respondent No.1) against the defendants (Appellants) seeking accounts and dissolution of an unreg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Return of Proceedings under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Notification dated 27.2.1984 vests Additional Sessions Judge with powers of District Judge for revenue district Gondia, making him competent to entertain Section 9 applications.

14 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Liladhar s/o Hemraj Agrawal, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petitions for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Compliance with Directions. Failure to File Affidavit of Documents and Appear Before Court Leads to Dismissal Under Rule 34 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two company petitions (CP 496/2014 and CP 497/2014) filed by Janak Herkishen Vaswani and Mrs. Renuka Herkishen Vaswani respectiv...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)