Search Results for "Presumption Under Section 139"

350 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Jagadish R, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless accused rebuts with probable defence.

The appeal was filed by the complainant, Smt. G. Suma, challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.01.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Absence of Legally Recoverable Debt Allegation. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails to aver existence of legally enforceable debt or liability.

The petitioner, R Parimala Bai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of proceedings in CC No.22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Absence of Legally Recoverable Debt Allegation. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails as no averment of legally enforceable debt or liability exists.

The petitioner, R Parimala Bai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of proceedings in C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands in favor of complainant unless rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Mahesh Urban Credit Coop. Society Ltd., through its manager, filed a criminal appeal challenging the acquittal of the respondent, Naray...