Search Results for "PFA Rules"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Belated Filing After Expiry of Best Before Date. Right Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Frustrated as Complaint Filed 16 Months After Best Before Date.

The applicant, M/s Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturing company, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case Due to Inordinate Delay Depriving Right to Reanalysis. Delay of 35 months in filing complaint violated Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, rendering trial futile.

The applicants, who were directors of M/s. Bunge Agri Business India Ltd., filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal Under Proviso to Section 372 CrPC — Condonation of Delay Granted. The court held that the victim's right to appeal is independent and delay can be condoned if sufficient cause is shown.

The petitioner, Parbhani District Central Bank Ltd., through its Assistant Manager Digambar s/o Madanrao Parve, filed a criminal writ petition challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-Analysis. Accused Acquitted as Sample Became Unfit for Analysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra filed three appeals against the acquittal of the accused Harishchandra Sadhuram Agarwal, a vendor and proprietor of a kirana ...