Search Results for "PDS Control Order"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.

The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Airport Operator's Challenge to Customs Regulation Requiring Bill of Entry for Export Goods. Regulation 5(2) of Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 Held Intra Vires Customs Act, 1962 and Constitutional.

The petitioner, M/s. Mumbai International Airport Private Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Regulation 5(2) of the Handling o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Granting Rebate to Merchant Exporter. Rebate Claim Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 Is Independent of Manufacturer's Bogus Cenvat Credit.

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the revisional authority under Section 35EE of ...