Search Results for "Open Space Conversion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Open Space Conversion"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.

13 Nov 2024

The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jul 2024

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Planning Authority in Fee Revision Dispute — Revised Charges for Infrastructure and Premium FSI Upheld. The Court held that liability to pay charges arises at the time of grant of planning permission, not at the date of application, and authority can revise demands based on revised rates prevailing on the date of permission.

29 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and Prestige Estates Project Ltd. regarding the revision of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission for Construction Allegedly Encroaching on Public Right of Way. Court finds no violation of licence conditions and holds that petitioners failed to establish any public right of way over the property.

19 Nov 2013

The petitioners, a village group and its president, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging development permiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain suit challenging acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as remedy lies before Reference Court under Section 18.

10 Oct 2013

The appellants, owners of a property in Agonda, Goa, filed a suit seeking withdrawal from acquisition of their plots and compensation of Rs. 1,20,00,0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Rent Control Case — Subletting and Default in Payment of Rent Established. The court upheld the appellate judgment reversing the trial court's dismissal of the landlord's eviction suit under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

4 Jan 2010

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The landlords (respondents) filed a suit for eviction agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Panchayat Resolution and Demolition Notice in Property Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Possession Over Disputed Land. The court held that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in writ proceedings and that the petitioners had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 180 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, a group of individuals claiming to be owners and in possession of certain properties in Nuvem, Salcette, Goa, filed a writ petition u...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)