Search Results for "National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

309 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 309 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Held Efficacious. No Interference Under Article 226 in Absence of Fraud or Collusion.

The petitioner, Buniya Devi Chauhan, through her power of attorney holder Dharmendra Shambhunath Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Complainant not required to prove service obtained for self-employment livelihood unless appellant proves commercial purpose.

Consumer Protection - Maintainability of Complaint - Definition of Consumer - Service obtained for Commercial Purpose - Onus of Proof - Burden of Proo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Reappointment of District Forum Presidents Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 10(2) of the Act Prescribes a Single Term of Five Years or Until Age 65, Barring Reappointment.

The judgment addresses a common question arising in multiple writ petitions: whether the President of a District Forum constituted under Section 10 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...