Search Results for "Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act"

457 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 457 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recovery of Charas. Statements under Section 67 of NDPS Act, 1985 held admissible and voluntary, and recovery of contraband from house and auto rickshaw established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had affirmed the conviction of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Recovery and Inadmissibility of Confessional Statements. Court Holds That Confessional Statements Under Section 67 NDPS Act Are Inadmissible and That Absence of Contraband Recovery and Inconclusive Test Reports Weigh in Favor of Bail.

The Supreme Court dealt with two special leave petitions arising from a common judgment of the Madras High Court concerning bail under the Narcotic Dr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Incomplete Charge-Sheet Without Chemical Analysis Report. Charge-sheet filed without Chemical Examiner's report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. is incomplete, entitling accused to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.

The applicant, Sagar Parshuram Joshi, was arrested on 12th October 2019 in connection with Crime No. II-369 of 2019 registered at Kopar Khairane Polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 21(c) NDPS Act but Reduces Sentence to 16 Years. Court Holds That Section 32B Does Not Limit Sentencing Discretion to Enumerated Factors; Other Relevant Factors Like Quantity May Be Considered.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The appellant, Rafiq Qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Other Mandatory Provisions. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellants, Raju Dhanju Rathod and Ramesh Liganna Mudraj, were convicted by the Special Court for NDPS, Bombay, for offences under Section 20(c) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail in NDPS Case — Commercial Quantity of Opium Determined by Total Weight, Not Morphine Content. The court held that the Special Judge erred in calculating morphine content to bring the quantity below the commercial threshold, and the bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act applies.

The Union of India filed an application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents (original accused) by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Pune, ...