Search Results for "NSE Regulations"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "NSE Regulations"

69 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Application in SEBI Investigation Case — Applicant Failed to Show Prima Facie Case of No Offence Under SEBI Act and IPC. Court Held That Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted Where Investigation Is at Nascent Stage and Applicant's Role in Alleged Fraudulent Scheme Requires Detailed Scrutiny.

11 Sep 2025

The applicant, Rajiv Ranjan Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) in connecti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Stock Broker's Appeal for Fee Exemption Under SEBI Regulations Due to Non-Compliance with Conversion Conditions. The court upheld that fee continuity benefits under Para 4 of Schedule III to SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992 require the erstwhile individual to be a whole-time director holding 40% shares, which was not satisfied in this transfer of membership card.

20 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, concerning fee exemption for a corporate stock broker. Sri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction in Arbitration Petition. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Member-Client Agreement Conferring Jurisdiction on Mumbai Courts is Valid and Binding.

8 Apr 2013

The petitioner, SPS Share Brokers Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act for Lack of Patent Illegality. Counterclaim Dismissal Upheld as Reasoned and Within Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion.

31 Mar 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Indiabulls Securities Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange (NSE), challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Mar 2012

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Wartsila India Limited — Court Approves Special Resolution for Reduction of Share Capital to Provide Exit to Minority Shareholders, Rejecting Oppression Allegations. The Court held that the reduction was bona fide and not oppressive, and confirmed the reduction under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 1956.

15 Nov 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Petition filed by Wartsila India Limited (WIL) seeking confirmation of a special resolution passed on 10th November 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in NIFTY Trade Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that petitioners failed to prove unauthorized trade and that credit note was accepted without objection.

11 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Intex Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Mehta, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)