Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Rules 1989"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Rules 1989"

319 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's Review Order and Restores Compensation Award; Holds Tribunal Has No Power of Review Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Due to Absence of Specific Review Provision.

8 Oct 2020

The petitioners, parents of the deceased Hanumaiah, filed MVC No.1010/1998 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madhugiri under Section 166 of t...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Variation of Permit for Additional Singles in Bus Service Operations — Rejects Over-Saturation Claim as Bar Only Applies to New Permits Under Section 6(4) of Tamil Nadu Act 41 of 1992. Petitioners Holding Valid Permits Entitled to Seek Variation Under Rule 4 of Motor Vehicles (Special Provisions) Rules, 1995.

6 Feb 2026

The case involves two revision petitions filed by bus service operators, N. Natarajan and M. Krishnamoorthy, against the order of the State Transport ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Auto Rickshaw Unions' Challenge to Mandatory Electronic Digital Fare Meter Fitment in Larger Consumer Interest. Notification under Rule 137 of Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Upheld as Valid Exercise of State's Legislative Competence Despite Petitioners' Hardship Claims.

31 Mar 2012

The Bombay High Court heard and dismissed two writ petitions challenging a State Government notification making electronic digital fare meters mandato...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Automotive Manufacturer in Octroi Exemption Dispute — Chassis and Parts for Assembly Included Under 'Motor Vehicles' Entry. Entry in Table of Rates for Octroi, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, interpreted to include components essential for manufacture of motor vehicles, applying beneficial construction and noscitur a sociis.

4 Aug 2006

The case involves a reference to the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arising from an ambiguity in a Division Bench judgment in Bajaj Tempo Limited...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows State's Petition, Quashes Labour Court Order in Recovery of Motor Vehicle Compensation Deduction — Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act Not Maintainable for Disputed Liability. Labour Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Adjudicating Entitlement to Recover Deductions Made Under Joint and Several Liability Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

19 Sep 2019

The State of Maharashtra and the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Akola filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Labour Court, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Holds Insurer Liable for Autorickshaw Accident Despite Driver Lacking Transport Endorsement. Driving Licence for Light Motor Vehicle Covers Autorickshaw as Public Transport Vehicle Under Section 2(21) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

23 Aug 2022

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 24.10.2009 passed by the MACT, Mangaluru in MV...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Driving License in Motor Vehicle Act Case — Lack of Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Petitioner's license suspended under Section 19(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 without prior notice or opportunity to show cause.

5 Feb 2015

The petitioner, a driver employed with KSRTC, was involved in a road accident on 25.08.2014 while driving a bus. An FIR was registered under Sections ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

3 Aug 2019

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sales Tax Case on Handling Charges. Handling charges for registration of motor cycles are not part of sale price under Section 2(25) of MVAT Act, 2002.

11 Jul 2011

The Revenue appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which set aside tax on handling charges collected by the respondent, a dea...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bus Operators' Challenge to RTO Circular on Contract Carriage Permits — Circular Held Valid as Clarificatory and Not Imposing New Conditions. The court held that the impugned circular dated 19.02.2025 is merely clarificatory and does not impose any new conditions beyond those under Section 74 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2 Jun 2025

The petitioners, an association of bus operators and individual bus operators holding contract carriage permits under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ch...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)