Search Results for "Mamlatdar Court's Act"

322 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Heirs in Land Mutation Dispute — Orders Certification of Mutation Entries Despite Pending Civil Suit. Revenue Authorities Cannot Refuse Mutation Based on Disputed Title Without Adjudicating Succession Rights Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The present petition was filed by the heirs of the deceased Maniben Keshabhai Parmar, seeking a writ of mandamus to quash and set aside orders passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Orders in Land Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice Principles. Failure to Provide Hearing Opportunity to Stakeholders Under Section 5 of Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 Renders Proceedings Void as Authorities Acted Mechanically Without Judicial Application of Mind.

The dispute originated from proceedings under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 concerning certain agricultural lands. The petitioners, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Revision Due to Gross Delay. Inordinate Delay of 34 Years in Challenging Mamlatdar's Order Cannot Be Condoned Without Proper Explanation Under Tenancy Act.

The State of Gujarat, through the Deputy Collector, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Section 6 Declaration Issued Beyond One Year from Last Publication of Section 4 Notification Invalidates Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Riva Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its director Vishwanath Balaram Naik Palyekar, challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Mundkar Claim Against Respondents on Government Land — Act Not Applicable to Government-Owned Land. Section 39 of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 exempts government lands, and Class II occupancy does not confer ownership.

The petitioner, Shankar Babani Halarnkar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Administrative Tribunal in Mundkar Revision Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Declaration of Tenancy Attains Finality and Cannot Be Ignored by Civil Court. The Additional District Court erred in ignoring the tenancy declaration in Tenancy Case No.9/94 which had become final and binding on the parties.

The case involves a second appeal by the plaintiff, Vishnum Shankar Naik, against the judgment of the Additional District Court in a suit for declarat...