Search Results for "Mamlatdar’s Court Act, 1906"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Dispute Pertains to Civil Rights and Title.

The petitioners, Tejram Hajare and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging mutation entries made in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law arose as the first appellate court's findings were based on evidence and not perverse under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants against the judgment and decree passed by the first appellate court, which had confirme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Agreement to Sell Despite Non-Payment of Balance Consideration. Court Holds That Time Was Not of Essence in Absence of Express Stipulation and That Possession Delivered Under Agreement Constitutes Part Performance.

The dispute arose out of an agreement to sell dated 1st June 1978 executed by the original defendant No.2 (since deceased, represented by appellants) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition Challenging Remand Order by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy Dispute. Finality Clause under Section 73 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Does Not Bar Revision Jurisdiction of Tribunal When Possession Issue Remains Unresolved.

The petitioners, landlords, were aggrieved by an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 31 July 1991 in Revision Application No. MRT.P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Revenue Records — Revenue Entries Do Not Confer Title, Civil Suit Is Proper Remedy.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer ...