Search Results for "Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2005"

307 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Entry Tax on Goods. Petitioners Argue That Differential Tax Burden on Imported LNG and Air Conditioners Violates Constitutional Provisions, Relying on Jindal Stainless Steel Principle.

Three writ petitions were heard together by the Bombay High Court, all challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on the Entry of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows University's Revision Petitions in VAT Dispute — Supply of Textbooks and Uniforms to Students Not Taxable as 'Sale'. Educational Institution Providing Essential Items to Students as Part of Education Is Not a Dealer Under KVAT Act, 2003.

The case involves sales tax revision petitions filed by Manipal University under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act). ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Assessment Order and Trade Circular as Ultra Vires Section 6A of CST Act. Inter-State Job Work Movement Not Deemed Sale Under Section 6A Because It Does Not Cover Principal-to-Principal Transactions.

The petitioner, a manufacturer and job worker, received spent catalyst from customers within and outside Maharashtra, processed it, and returned the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Classification. Classification of dealers based on turnover for LBT exemption is valid under Article 14 as it has a rational nexus with the object of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and M/s. Vidarbha Distillers, are dealers within the meaning of Section 2(16A) of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...