Search Results for "Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules"

1127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rajasthan High Court's Decision to Fix Minimum Cut-Off Marks After Examination in Translator Recruitment. Fixing 75% Cut-Off After Examination Held Impermissible as It Alters Selection Procedure Mid-Process Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The case arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Rajasthan High Court in 2009 for 13 posts of Translators. The applicable rules, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Employee Gratuity Payout Deferred Pending Appeal Conclusion. Court rules that gratuity is payable only after final judicial orders, including appeals, are issued under Maharashtra Civil Services Pension Rules.

This case deals with the entitlement of a State Government employee to receive gratuity upon the conclusion of judicial proceedings under Rule 130(1)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'Not Suitable' Declaration for Judicial Post Candidate Due to Non-Application of Mind and Arbitrariness. MPSC's Rejection of Candidate Based on Vague Grounds of 'Unsuitable' Without Specific Reasons Violates Article 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Shobhit Gaur, a law graduate from Bhartiya Vidyapeeth, Pune, enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of Delhi in 2010 and practic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Recommendation by Review Committee before amendment of Rule 19 cannot be basis for order under amended rule without fresh consideration.

The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenged an order of compulsory retirement dated 28.09.2011 passed under the Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Temporary Lecturers Challenging Termination — Ad Hoc Appointments Made Without Following Recruitment Rules Do Not Confer Right to Regularisation or Reinstatement.

The case involves a writ petition filed by 25 individuals who were appointed as temporary lecturers on ad hoc basis at Government Polytechnic College,...