Search Results for "Maharashtra Fragmentation Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Fragmentation Act"

81 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

High Court

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

24 Feb 2026

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Delhi Land Reforms Act Section 50(a) - Upholds Constitutional Validity and Succession Rules for Agricultural Land. The Court held that Section 50(a) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 is protected under Article 31B of the Constitution due to its inclusion in the Ninth Schedule before 1973, and no repugnancy exists with the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as they operate in different legislative fields under State and Concurrent Lists.

20 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a civil appeal challenging the constitutional validity of Section 50(a) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Judicial Officer for Alleged Disregard of Precedents. Court holds that mere erroneous orders or non-mention of cited judgments do not constitute contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

3 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Yogesh Waman Athavale, an advocate practicing in Chiplun, filed a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Variation of Consolidation Scheme Under Section 32 of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1948 — Scheme Finalized in 1990 Cannot Be Varied After 29 Years Due to Laches and Lack of Jurisdiction.

26 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Kisan Bhimrao Patil and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale of Agricultural Land — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. The plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the courts below correctly dismissed the suit for specific performance.

8 Jun 2016

The appellant (original plaintiff) filed a suit for specific performance of a contract of sale of 6 acres of agricultural land (Gat No. 69/A) situated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Consolidation Orders Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Petitioners Failed to Challenge Earlier Orders in Time, and Subsequent Orders Were Merely Consequential.

4 Oct 2011

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a letter dated 2nd February 1990 and a notice dated 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sale of Fragment to Adjacent Owner Under Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Sale of Fragment to Owner of Adjacent Survey Number is Valid as 'Contiguous Owner' Includes Owner of Adjacent Land.

27 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Balwantrao Bhagwantrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition challenging the sale of a fragment of land (Survey No. 7/1) by respondent No. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Section 57 of Bombay Sales Tax Act — Refund of Tax on Gas Hot Plates Upheld as Exempted Goods Under Entry 164[1][v]. The court held that the Assistant Commissioner erred in revising the refund order without properly considering the exemption notification, and the petitioner was entitled to refund of tax paid on exempted goods.

6 Jun 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv Shyam Sales Enterprises, a partnership firm dealing in gas hot plates as importer and retailer, filed a writ petition under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Sales Tax Exemption Dispute. Revisional Authority Under Section 57 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Has Power to Set Aside Refund Orders Granted Under Section 62 When Exemption Notification Does Not Apply.

6 Jun 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv Shyam Sales Enterprises, a partnership firm dealing in gas hot plates as importer and retailer, filed a writ petition under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)