Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

Trending :

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Real Estate Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

23 Apr 2024

The appellant, Mohammed Zain Khan, filed a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for APMC Election Under Amended Ordinance. The court held that an Ordinance amending Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulations) Act, 1963, which allowed any agriculturist to contest elections even if not a voter, applied to the ongoing election process, and the rejection of the petitioner's nomination was invalid.

12 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Sow. Laxmibai Vishwanath Gaware, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her nomination form for the election to the Agricu...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals in APMC License Cancellation Case — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact. The court upheld the Single Judge's dismissal of writ petitions challenging license cancellation by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, finding no perversity or error of law.

14 May 2018

The case involves two intra-Court appeals (W.A. Nos. 6870/2017 and 6871/2017) filed by Sri Chitturi Durga Rao and Nirmala Bagodi respectively, against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.

1 Mar 2018

A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Market Area Notifications Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, 1963 — Petitioners' Challenge Barred by Res Judicata and Delay. Notifications dated 24-2-1995 and 17-4-1998 declaring Jadhavwadi as principal market area upheld as petitioners failed to show any legal infirmity and were bound by earlier decisions in WP 2145/2004 and WP 7123/2005.

23 Jun 2017

The petitioners, four individuals from Aurangabad, filed a writ petition in 2006 challenging two notifications issued by the respondents: one dated 24...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Secretary of Agriculture Produce Market Committee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Violative of Section 44(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Principles of Natural Justice.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Deorao S/o Bhujangrao Fuke, was serving as the Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Majalgaon, District Beed....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to State Notification Fixing Sugarcane Price Despite Central FRP Under Essential Commodities Act. Section 6 of the EC Act Grants Overriding Effect to Central Orders Over Inconsistent State Enactments.

6 Nov 2014

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the state government's notification fixing sugarcane price and the c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Deemed License Under Section 7(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Quashes Seizure Notice for Failure to Consider Application Within 30 Days. The Court held that the petitioner is deemed to have secured a license when the Market Committee failed to decide the application within 30 days, and the seizure notice was illegal.

27 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Shree Shyambaba Cotton Company, through its proprietor Anil Vallabhdas Kakani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Levy of Market Fee on Cardamom by Agricultural Produce Market Committee — Cardamom Held to be Plantation Crop Not Agricultural Produce Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Market (Regulation) Act, 1963. The court held that the Spices Board Act, 1986 (Central Act) prevails over the State Act and cardamom cannot be subjected to market fee.

23 Jun 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Mohanlal Keshavlal & Co., a wholesale trader in cardamom, filed a writ petition challenging the levy of market fee by the Agricul...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)