Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Para-Teachers Seeking Regularisation in Jharkhand. Contractual Engagement Under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Does Not Confer Right to Absorption or Pay Parity with Regular Teachers.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by para-teachers engaged under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in Jharkhand, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to NLSIU's Separate Admission Test NLAT — Upholds University's Autonomy in Admission Process. NLSIU's decision to conduct its own entrance exam for 2020-21, deviating from CLAT, was held to be within its statutory powers under the NLSIU Act, 1986, and not arbitrary.

The judgment arises from a public interest writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla, father of a st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of LIC Employee Challenging Transfer Order. Transfer is an incident of service and courts should not interfere unless mala fides or violation of statutory rules is established.

The appellant, Ramesh, was working as an Assistant Administrative Officer in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) at Raichur. He was transfer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Husband and In-laws Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Complaint Filed at Pune While Shared Household Was in Hyderabad — Held That Jurisdiction Lies Where Cause of Action Arises, Not at Wife's Temporary Residence.

The petitioners, the husband and his parents, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the proceedings initiat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...