Search Results for "MIDC plot allotment"

53 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order Directing Registration of FIR Under Section 175(3) BNSS Against MIDC Employee in Plot Allotment Case — Held That Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind and Not Pass Mechanical Orders Under Section 175(3) BNSS.

The petitioner, Namrata Subhash Pawar, an Assistant in MIDC, challenged the order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners' Challenge to Section 6(1) Notification Fails Due to Delay, Laches, and Existence of Alternative Remedy.

The petitioners, who are residents and agriculturists of Mahalunge, Taluka-Mulshi, District Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints Against Hospital. The Court held that the Industrial Court correctly declined jurisdiction when the employer-employee relationship was disputed due to contract labour claims, following Supreme Court precedents.

The litigation arose out of writ petitions filed by a group of workers (Aayas and Ward Boys) challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5634 OF 2014

Three writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a group of workers, including Aayas and Ward Boys, challenging the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Stamp Duty Exemption Case — Agreement to Lease Not a Lease, Notification Exemption Inapplicable. The court held that a document which is only an agreement to execute a lease in future does not qualify as a lease for exemption under the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958.

The appellant, Pankaj Ramlakhan Dubey, proprietor of M/s. Vedamsh Agro Food Products, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement in Company Petition for Revival of Sick Pharmaceutical Company. Scheme under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956, Approved Involving Settlement of Secured Creditors' Dues through Cash and Securities.

The Pharmaceutical Products of India Limited (PPIL), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed two company petitions under Section 3...