Search Results for "Lack of Corroboration"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kishor Shankar Palve, was convicted by the Special Court and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 3 punish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4, 6, 8, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Mahadeo @ Nana Gundiba Khandale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati in Special (POCSO) Case No.8/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Arun Popatrao Pingale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Gautam Chandrakant Khairnar and Bhaiyya @ Sharad Chandrakant Khairnar against their conviction under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vikas Shantaram Shinde, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 376(2)(i)(j)(n) and 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent of Minor Victim Not Valid, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ketan Sanjay Kokate, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO, Pune for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 3 punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 452, 506 IPC set aside as medical evidence and witness testimony failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashok @ Bhaiyya s/o Magan Koli, was convicted by the trial court under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 354-A IPC, Section 363/511 IPC, and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 26 January 2016, when the informant, a 16-year-old girl, along with her cousin sister, was walking to school for R...