Search Results for "Karnataka Rent Act 1999"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case — Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Security Deposit Refund. Cheques Issued for Refund of Security Deposit Under Lease Agreement Constitute Legally Enforceable Debt; Compensation Enhanced to Full Deposit Amount.

The case arises from a lease-cum-rent agreement dated 12th May 2014 between the appellant-accused (landlord) and the respondent-complainant (tenant) f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court in Capital Gains Tax Case — Accrual Occurs on Date of Award, Not Notification. Transfer of Capital Asset Under Section 45 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Is Complete Only When Compensation Is Determined by Collector's Award, Even if Possession Taken Earlier.

The case concerns the assessment year 1971-1972 for the assessee Amrik Singh HUF, whose land was acquired by the Haryana Government for a college play...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Validity of Karnataka Parliamentary Secretaries Allowances Act, 1963 and Appointment of Parliamentary Secretaries. The Court held that the Act is within legislative competence and appointments are valid under Article 164(1-A) of the Constitution.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the constitutional validity ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Deposit Application in Rent Suit. Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Used to Direct Deposit of Rent When No Specific Provision Applies and Suit Governed by Transfer of Property Act.

The petitioner, Smt. B V Nagakannika, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 28.3.2016 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Plaintiffs in Tenancy Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Tenancy Rights. Court holds that mere possession or payment of rent does not establish tenancy without proof of lawful transfer or succession under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a dispute over a room (suit premises) allotted in lieu of an earlier tenanted room in a chawl at Mahim, Mumbai. The plaintiffs, Sulo...