Search Results for "Juvenile Justice Rules"

209 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Benefit of Doubt Extended Where Sole Eyewitness Testimony Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Match Ocular Version Under Section 302 IPC.

The case pertains to the death of Mandeep Kumar on 21.10.2018 following an alleged attack by seven masked persons. The appellant, Sagar, was identifie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Juvenile Cannot File Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC; Remedy Lies Under Juvenile Justice Act. The JJ Act is a complete code providing for bail provisions for children in conflict with law, and Section 438 CrPC is not available to them.

The case involved a reference to a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court to decide whether a juvenile in conflict with law can file an application f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder Case Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Sole Testimony of Injured Eyewitness Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 304 Part II/34 IPC When Credible and Reliable.

The case pertains to an incident on 18th June, 1995, during a Jagjit Singh night program in Nainital, where the deceased Rajesh Sah intervened when so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Convict in Gangrape Case on Ground of Juvenility — Inquiry Report Shows Appellant Was Below 18 Years at Time of Offence. Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 Benefit Extended as High Court Failed to Conduct Mandatory Age Determination Inquiry Under Section 7A and Rule 12.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Raju, who was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gangrape and sentenced to 10 year...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Child Welfare Committee Chairperson for Violation of Natural Justice. Notification under Section 29 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 set aside as no opportunity of hearing was given before removal.

The petitioner, Renuka Vishnu Ghule, was appointed as a Member of the Child Welfare Committee, Aurangabad, by notification dated 02.06.2008. She later...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Sole Eyewitness, Being Brother of Deceased, Was Not Credible and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Prosecution Case.

The case pertains to the murder of one person, for which the appellants (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Mother's Custody Petition for Minor Daughters Rescued from Brothel Under PITA. Custody of rescued minor victims under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 vests with Child Welfare Committee for rehabilitation, not with biological mother, to prevent re-exploitation.

The petitioner, Smt. Babita, mother of two minor daughters aged 15 and 16, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging orders of the Judicial Magistrat...