Search Results for "Judicial officers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Judicial officers"

4178 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4178 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Retired Industrial Court Presiding Officers Seeking Pension Under Judicial Service Rules. Service as Presiding Officer of Industrial Court under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 is not qualifying service for pension under Maharashtra Judicial Service Pension Rules, 1982, as Industrial Court is not part of the judicial service under the High Court.

14 Dec 2018

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by retired Presiding Officers of the Industrial Court in Maharashtra, challenging the denial of pensi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Power to Suspend Judicial Officer in Sexual Harassment Case. The High Court's control under Article 235 of the Constitution includes authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings and suspend a judicial officer pending inquiry under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013.

21 Aug 2019

The petitioner, a judicial officer in the Delhi Higher Judicial Services, was accused of sexual harassment by a Junior Judicial Assistant who worked a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.

1 Jan 1970

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Review Committee Recommendation Without Considering Petitioner's Representations and Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules 2008.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Avinash Vitthalrao Choudhary, a judicial officer appointed as Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate First Class on 14 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Orders in Separation of Powers and Contempt Case Due to Judicial Overreach and Abuse of Process. High Court Lacked Power to Direct Notification of Rules Under Article 229 of Constitution and Improperly Initiated Criminal Contempt for Legal Challenges, Violating Principles of Separation of Powers and Legal Remedies.

3 Jan 2024

The appeals arose from two orders of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 4 April 2023 and 19 April 2023. The factual...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers in Public Interest — Screening Committee's Evaluation Not Arbitrary or Perverse. Rule 74(b)(ii) of Jharkhand Service Code, 2001, allows compulsory retirement after 30 years of service or 50 years of age in public interest; court found no mala fides or perversity in the decision.

27 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by erstwhile judicial officers of Jharkhand challenging their compulsory retirement under Rule 74...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against High Court Order on IFS Promotions, Quashing Direction for Adjustment Against Notional Vacancies. Clubbing of Vacancies Violates Regulation 5 of IFS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1966, and High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Granting Relief Based on Inapplicable Precedent.

29 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from promotions to the Indian Forest Service (IFS) cadre in 1996, where vacancies from 1984 to 1996 were clubbed together, cont...

Supreme Court

Challenging Minimum Qualifying Marks in Judicial Appointments: Upholding Constitutional Integrity Exploring the Constitutionality of Viva Voce Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat District Judiciary Selection Processes

6 May 2024

The constitutionality of rules prescribing minimum qualifying marks in the viva voce test for appointments to the District Judiciary in Bihar and Guja...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Challenge to MPSC Procedural Rule on Wait-List in Judicial Service Recruitment. Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 Rule 6(3)(b) and Article 234 of the Constitution Examined.

16 Sep 2016

The Bombay High Court Division Bench heard a batch of writ petitions filed by candidates who had applied for the post of Civil Judge Junior Division a...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hears Writ Appeals Filed by Registrar General Against Multiple Judicial Officers. The appeals, all service-related, involve a dispute concerning the seniority or conditions of service of judicial officers across various positions.

1 Apr 2026

...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)