Search Results for "Indian Companies Act 1913"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Indian Companies Act 1913"

180 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Stay of Criminal Proceedings under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Held That Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 Requires Stay Unless Leave of Company Court is Obtained. Proceedings Against Ex-Managing Director in Personal Capacity May Continue Subject to Leave, But Stay Order Attained Finality; Trial Directed to Be Completed Within Six Months.

25 Jun 2024

The petitioner, M/s Rajesh Exports Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Cut-off Date for Workmen Dues in Winding Up of Swadeshi Mills. Official Liquidator's Calculation Up to Appointment of Provisional Liquidator Challenged by Workmen Seeking Dues Up to Winding Up Order.

28 Oct 2013

The matter concerns a company application filed by five workmen of M/s Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd., which was wound up. The company had approximately 2970...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Assignment of Assets by Ex-Director Void Under Sections 536(2) and 537(1)(b) of Companies Act, 1956 — Post-Winding Up Sale Without Court Leave Invalid. The court held that any disposition of company property after winding up without court approval is void, and subrogation does not permit sale of assets without leave of the court.

21 Oct 2015

The judgment concerns two reports filed by the Official Liquidator seeking a declaration that a Deed of Assignment dated 14.03.2012 executed by Mr. Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Adjudication Proceedings in FERA Case Due to Inordinate Delay of 27 Years. Revival of show cause notices after 27 years held arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

18 Jan 2010

The petitioners, Cambata Industries Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Former Directors in Companies Act Complaint — Complaint Barred by Limitation and Filed Without Mandatory Sanction. The court held that the complaint under Section 538(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 1956 was time-barred under Section 468 Cr.P.C. and lacked prior sanction under Section 538(3) of the Act, warranting quashing of proceedings.

23 Mar 2021

The present criminal petition was filed by Sri Avinash Subramanyam and Smt. Vani Sharma, former directors of M/s. Shimbu Imports and Exports (P) Ltd. ...

High Court

SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.

16 Jun 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice.

12 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show C...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Commercial Dispute. Petition Involves Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Allowing Rejection of Goods After Acceptance, Contrary to Section 42 of Sale of Goods Act.

24 Dec 2025

The petitioner, a manufacturing company, issued a purchase order to the respondent, a trading company, for the supply of stainless steel seamless tube...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)