Search Results for "Income Tax Refund"

462 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Refund of Rs.56 Crore Service Tax Deposit Retained Without Authority of Law. Petitioner Bank's deposit made under protest to buy peace on interchange income cannot be retained without show cause notice or adjudication order.

The petitioner, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the retent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for Non-Resident Taxpayer Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Satisfaction. Section 148 notices under Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as Assessing Officer failed to record reasons and obtain sanction before issuing notices beyond four years.

The petitioner, a non-resident Indian residing in Dubai, was regularly assessed to tax in India on income accruing or arising in India. He had investe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Input Tax Credit Based on Annual Audited Accounts in KVAT Act Cases. The court held that Section 10(3) of the KVAT Act permits availment of input tax credit based on the annual audited statement in Form VAT 240, irrespective of the claim in returns under Section 35.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by M/s MFAR Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Mangalore Force, challenging the interpretation of Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Prospective Application of Section 234D. Interest Under Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Cannot Be Charged for Assessment Year 2002-03 as the Provision Applies Only From Assessment Year 2004-05.

The appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged an order dated 24/11/2010 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...