Search Results for "ITAT Rules"

68 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Tax Appeals in Reassessment Cases Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Substantial Question of Law Found as Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Appreciation of Evidence.

The judgment pertains to multiple tax appeals filed by individual assessees against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Goa. The appellants, including Sha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case, Allows Investment Allowance and Revenue Expenditure Deduction. Processing of Ore Constitutes Manufacture or Production Under Section 32A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Film Production Expenditure Disallowance Case. Expenditure on Positive Prints and Advertisement for Film 'KAAL' Held Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Rule 9A Does Not Exclude General Deduction Provision.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to the assessment yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure. Redemption fine of Rs. 75,00,000 paid for unauthorized import of almonds held allowable as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which allowed the asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Application for Reference in Co-operative Bank Deduction Case. Interest on Government Securities Earmarked Against Statutory Reserve Fund Held Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City III, against t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Non-Compete Fee Taxability. Amount Received Under Deed of Covenant Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable Under Section 28(ii)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Due to Separate Genuine Transaction and Procedural Error in High Court's Judgment.

The appeal concerned the assessment year 1995-96 involving Shri Shiv Raj Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Cash Credit Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 Despite Rejection of Books for Gross Profit. Books of Account Can Be Partially Relied Upon for Different Additions Even After Rejection Under Section 145(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal arose from a challenge to an addition of Rs.2,26,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as unexplained cash credits. The ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue Expenditure Classification for Technical Consultancy and Labour Housing in Income Tax Reference. Payments for feasibility studies and labour welfare held deductible as revenue expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue department. The assessee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case for Pharmaceutical Freebies. Expenses on Gifting Freebies to Medical Practitioners Are Deductible Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as Indian Medical Council Regulations Only Prohibit Acceptance, Not Gifting, Under Explanation 1.

The dispute involved a pharmaceutical company, referred to as Apex, appealing against a High Court judgment that upheld orders disallowing part of its...