Search Results for "IPC 392"

225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and MCOC Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove gang rape and organized crime.

The judgment pertains to appeals filed by convicts challenging their conviction for offences under Sections 392, 394, 366, 341, 354 and 376(2)(g) read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Disclosure Statement and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Common Articles and Hostile Witnesses Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arose from a robbery case where the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Trial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and Sections 392/397 IPC for robbery, with life imprisonment and seven years rigorous imprisonment respectively.

The appellant, Girvarsingh Bhagwatsingh Devda, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi, for the murder of Nirmala Premji Vora and for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Partial Quashing of FIR - Investigation Must Proceed for All Offences Including Sections 392, 395, 397 IPC

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Gujarat High Court which partly quashed an FIR registered as ICR No. 67 of 2017 at Gaekwad Haveli Police Stati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convicts' Petition for Concurrent Sentences in Multiple Robbery Cases. Court directs that sentences in seven cases run concurrently, applying Section 427(1) CrPC to avoid disproportionate punishment.

The petitioners, Akash Rashtrapal Deshpande and Nikunj @ Nikki Ramesh Sadhwani, were convicted in multiple robbery cases by Magistrate Courts. They we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Robbery Case Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals arising from a common conviction under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery. The appellants, Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 302 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of respondents Shripati Rama Kanase, Annappa Shripati Kanase, and Appa Shripati Kanase in Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder, Robbery, and House Trespass in Doctor's Killing — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt.

The appellant, Sunil Nirmal Bisth, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.1267 of 1996 for offe...