Search Results for "IPC 366A"

56 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO and IPC Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Trial Court's Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 366-A IPC.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Human Trafficking and POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Running Brothel and Exploiting Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Sunita @ Neha Machhindra Chandne and Sharda Machindra Chandne, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 370 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor — Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Devanand Rajabhau More, was convicted by the Special Court, Ambajogai, in Special POCSO Case No. 4/2014 for offences under Sections 363...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Cancels Bail in POCSO Case for Misuse of Liberty and Tampering with Evidence. The court held that the accused's conduct of threatening the victim and her family after being granted bail constituted misuse of liberty, warranting cancellation under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C.

The State of Karnataka, represented by Yagati Police, filed a petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking cancellat...