Search Results for "Group Grampanchayat"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Group Grampanchayat"

113 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration as Elected Sarpanch in Village Panchayat Election Dispute. Court holds that under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964, the Civil Judge cannot declare a candidate elected after setting aside an election; only the Returning Officer can conduct a fresh election.

1 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Prakash Narayan Harake, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 21.01.2022 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Grampanchayat Election Dispute — Caste Certificate Cancellation Upheld as Valid Ground for Disqualification. The court held that the cancellation of a caste certificate by the Scrutiny Committee is a valid ground for disqualification under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and the election of a candidate whose caste claim is invalidated is void.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arising from a writ petition concerning the election of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Grampanchayat Encroachment Case Due to Lack of Prosecution and Insufficient Evidence. Complaint under Maharashtra Gram Panchayat Act fails as appellant did not appear and evidence did not establish encroachment or public nuisance.

7 Feb 2005

The appellant, Kalidas Jamadar Sable, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Shivthar, District Satara. He filed a complaint against respondent No.1, Mugut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Section 35(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Notice Issued by Tahsildar Without Proper Verification of Signatures and Without Giving Opportunity to Sarpanch to Explain Grounds.

28 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Shri Raviraj Sambhajirao Nimbalkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kalnakwadi, Kolhapur. On 21st November 2017, some members...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat Election Process for Non-Compliance with Pre-Election Deposit Requirement. Petitioners failed to deposit required amount under Rule 7(2) of Maharashtra Gram Panchayat (Election) Rules, 2014, leading to rejection of nomination papers.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, residents of Khuneshwar village in Solapur district, filed two writ petitions challenging the election process for the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Finalization of Ward Formation and Conduct of Elections for Nagar Panchayat Phulambri. The court held that the respondents must comply with the directives in the letter dated 04.08.2015 to finalize ward formation and hold elections within specified time frames.

28 Oct 2015

The petitioners, residents of Phulambri, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to finalize ward formation and conduct elections ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Panchayat Raj Act Case — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9A(2) Notice Requirements. The court held that the notice period of seven clear days must exclude the date of service and the date of meeting, and failure to provide such notice renders the no-confidence motion void.

3 May 2023

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Shridhar Matkar, was the Sarpanch of Khirdi Village Panchayat. A notice of no-confidence motion was issued against him und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Procedural Irregularities Such as Lack of Proposer and Seconder and Secret Ballot Demand Found Not Fatal to the Motion's Validity as Majority Rule Prevails.

23 Jan 2024

The petitioners, Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Rahuwadi, were elected from a body of eleven members. On 3rd October 2023, seven members s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch; Upholds Validity of Requisition Received by Peshkar. Peshkar, as Senior-Most Revenue Officer, Validly Received Notice Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, When Tahsildar on Leave Per Section 10(b) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

28 Jan 2013

The petitioner was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Borgaon, Tq. Palam. Respondents Nos. 3 to 8, being members of the seven-member panchayat, submitted a...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)