Search Results for "Fee Refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Fee Refund"

381 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

17 Nov 2022

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Financier's Appeal in U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Case, Upholding Tax Liability for Financier-in-Possession. Financier Qualifies as 'Owner' Under Section 2(h) and Must Pay Tax in Advance Under Section 4, with Refund Available Under Section 12 for Non-Use, Irrespective of Actual Use or Registration Status.

22 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Bench Lucknow, which dismissed a writ petition filed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals, Affirms Refund of Licence Fee and Differential Amount for Period of Unlawful Closure of Distillery Premises. Licensee Entitled to Refund When Premises Sealed Without Opportunity of Hearing, and Suspension Order Passed Without Show-Cause Notice.

18 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the State of Bihar against a Patna High Court judgment directing refund of licence fee and differential amount ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Import Fee on Rectified Spirit Used for Potable Liquor. Levy Held Valid as Regulatory Fee Under Jharkhand Excise Act, 1915, as Rectified Spirit Used for Manufacture of Intoxicating Liquor Falls Within State's Legislative Competence Under Entry 8 List II.

2 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which had quashed a notification...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled by Consent Terms. The phrase 'claim for repayment' in Section 43(1) proviso of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 refers to the application to the court for refund order, not the subsequent certificate application.

5 Apr 2019

The suit was filed in 2014 by Bai Mamubai Bhimji Bhanji Trust and others against Neelkanth Mansions & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. On 28 October 2014, the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows 100% Refund of Court Fees on Settlement in Lok Adalat Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The Court held that Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 overrides the Court Fees Act, 1870, entitling the petitioner to full refund of court fees paid on settlement before Lok Adalat.

2 Apr 2019

The petitioner, a sugar factory, filed money suits against respondents in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division at Malshiras, District Solapur. Th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging TDS Provisions — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 194C, 194J, and 206AA of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the provisions are not arbitrary or discriminatory and that TRACES is a valid administrative mechanism.

26 Aug 2016

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by various assessees, including individuals and companies, challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax on Onsite Work at Customer's Premises Under Export of Service Rules, 2005. The court held that onsite work at customer's premises abroad qualifies as 'Service Provided from India' under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and the appellants are entitled to refund of service tax paid.

15 Sep 2014

The case involves appeals by Tech Mahindra Limited and other assessees against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CE...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Cess Paid Under Protest in Excise Matter — Unjust Enrichment Principle Not Applicable to Cess Under IDR Act. Section 11-B of Central Excise Act Held Inapplicable to Cess Collected Under Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, and Refund Directed with Interest.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Shree Vidhya Paper Mills and Mr. Rameshwarlal Motilal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs. 10,19,246...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)