Search Results for "Error Apparent on Record"

49 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in TNPSC Recruitment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review petition against order in WP No.14812 of 2024 dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioner, V.Arun Kumar, filed a review petition (REV.APLW No. 77 of 2026) before the Madras High Court seeking to review the order dated 31.7.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Review Application in Higher Grade Pay-Scale Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review of judgment in Letters Patent Appeal No. 523 of 2014 dismissed as applicants failed to show any error apparent on the face of the record under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The present application was filed by the applicants, who were original respondents in Letters Patent Appeal No. 523 of 2014, seeking review of the CAV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner's challenge to SRA's refusal to grant occupancy certificate fails as review court finds no mistake or error in original judgment.

The petitioner, Mumtaz H. Khoja, filed a review petition against the judgment dated 16 October 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to EPF Liability Determination. Review Application Under Section 7-B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Rejected as No Error Apparent on Record and Delay Not Explained.

The petitioner, Municipal Council, Dhamangaon, a civic body established in 1945 and governed by the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Specific Performance Suit — No Error Apparent on Record Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. Promoter of Proposed Cooperative Society Held to Have Locus Standi to Sue for Specific Performance Despite Society Being Unregistered.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 12 August 1981. The plaintiff, Respondent No.1, as chief promoter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petitions in Urban Land Ceiling Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review petitions under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC seeking review of order dated 17/06/2016 in WP Nos.54609-54610/2014(ULC) dismissed as no error apparent on record.

The review petitions were filed by M/s Vivekananda Foundation (R), claiming to be the allottee of a portion of land in Sy.Nos.81 and 82 of Kasaba Hobl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of judgment dated 21.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.711/2010 rejected as applicants sought re-argument of merits, not review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, tenants Shrichand s/o Rochaldas Khemani and Kawarlal s/o Rochaldas Khemani, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Electricity Tariff Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

The judgment pertains to four Civil Review Applications (Nos. 23, 24, 25 and 26 of 2011) filed by industrial consumers against the State of Goa and th...