Search Results for "Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952"

149 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows EPFO Board's Appeal, Holds Board is 'Aggrieved Person' Under Article 226. The Board, as a party before the EPF Appellate Tribunal, has locus standi to challenge the Tribunal's order by way of writ petition.

29 Apr 2026

The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund (EPFO), represented by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Coimbatore, filed a writ a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes EPF Assessment Order Against Employer for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Employer's Challenge to Section 7A Proceedings Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Succeeds as Show-Cause Notice Was Not Served and Order Was Passed Without Proper Inquiry.

1 Feb 2023

The petitioner, M/s. IBM India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15.07....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Authority's Petition Against Tribunal's Reduction of Damages Under Section 14B of EPF Act. Mens Rea Not Required for Imposition of Damages for Delayed Remittance; Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Lack of Reasons.

13 Sep 2022

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Remands EPF Coverage Dispute for Pigmy Agents to Provident Fund Commissioner for Enquiry Under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The court held that the determination of whether a pigmy agent is an 'employee' under Section 2(f) requires a factual enquiry, and set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order.

7 Jul 2022

The Central Board of Trustees and other petitioners challenged an order dated 29.08.2005 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to EPF Liability Determination. Review Application Under Section 7-B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Rejected as No Error Apparent on Record and Delay Not Explained.

18 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Municipal Council, Dhamangaon, a civic body established in 1945 and governed by the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats a...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Provident Fund Damages for Delayed Remittance. Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Imposes Strict Liability Without Requiring Mens Rea.

21 Sep 2015

The petitioner, M/s HMT Limited, a Central Public Sector Enterprise, challenged the order dated 2.1.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commiss...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging PF Liability for Contract Workers. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Para 30 of EPF Scheme for Non-Compliance by Contractors.

11 Apr 2014

The petitioner, M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged an order dated 1.7.2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Challenge to EPF Damages Order — Delay and Lack of Jurisdictional Error. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any error in the order imposing damages under Section 14-B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.

18 Sep 2013

The petitioner, M/s Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd, challenged an order dated 19.05.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner imposing damage...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Damages Levy Case Under Section 14B of EPF Act — Delay in Payment of Provident Fund Dues Attracts Damages Irrespective of Financial Difficulties. Financial Hardship Not a Valid Defence for Delayed Provident Fund Contributions Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

22 Jun 2005

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) appealed against a Single Judge order that set aside notices/orders dated 17.7.1990 and 24.6.1992 levy...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)