Search Results for "EPFO order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "EPFO order"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Damages Against Employer in EPF Act Case for Default in Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14B is Consequential Upon Default Without Requirement of Mens Rea for Breach of Civil Obligations.

23 Feb 2022

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, which upheld an order for recovery of damages under Section 14B of the Employees Pro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Private Security Agency Against EPF Coverage — Security Guards Held Employees of Agency, Not Clients. The court held that a private security agency providing security guards on payment basis is covered under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, as it renders expert services under G.S.R. 805 dated 17.05.1971.

2 Dec 2020

The appellant, M/s. Panther Security Service Private Limited, is a private security agency registered under the Private Security Agencies (Regulation)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petitions for Provident Fund Pensionary Benefits — EPF Scheme 1995. Employer's Default in Contribution Does Not Bar Employees' Entitlement to Pension Under Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995.

13 Jun 2019

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees seeking pensionary benefits under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes EPF Recovery Notices Against Purchaser of Company in Liquidation — Section 17B of EPF Act Not Attracted When Transfer is by Official Liquidator Under Court Supervision. The court held that the Official Liquidator is not the 'employer' under Section 17B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the sale by him does not attract joint liability for prior provident fund dues.

23 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Vibhu Drinks Private Limited, purchased a property from the Official Liquidator of M/s Niranjan Ayurved Bhavan Limited (a company in l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Seniority List of Section Supervisors in EPFO. Seniority Determined by Date of Promotion, Not by Date of Eligibility, Upheld by CAT.

13 Jan 2005

The petitioners, Smt. L.M. Mahadik and Shri S.D. Jagtap, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of ...

2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)