WRIT PETITION NO.19366 OF 2024
9 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"
541 result(s) found
Found 541 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.
17 Mar 2025The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...
- 867
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.
10 Mar 2025The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...
- 511
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.
10 Mar 2022The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...
- 407
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case: EOU Job Work for DTA Unit Without Export Violates EXIM Policy. The Court held that a 100% EOU cannot undertake job work for a DTA unit and clear finished goods to the DTA without exporting them, and such clearance is not eligible for concessional duty under Notification No.8/97-CE.
6 Mar 2020The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur against the CESTAT order that allowed the appeals of M/s Universal Ferro & A...
- 176
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cenvat Credit Interest Dispute — Reversal Without Utilization Does Not Attract Interest. Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 interpreted to require actual utilization for interest liability.
25 Mar 2019The appellant, Cipla Limited, a manufacturer of medicaments, was engaged in the manufacture of medicaments containing ethanol (alcohol) which fell out...
- 97
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Excise Duty Exemption Case — NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable When Basic Excise Duty Exempted. Exemption Notification Under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944 Covers NCCD as Duty of Excise, and Surcharges on Excise Duty Cannot Be Levied Without Substratum.
1 Mar 2019The appeal arose from a dispute between Bajaj Auto Limited (appellant) and the Union of India (respondent) regarding the liability to pay National Cal...
- 203
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Special Counsel in Customs and Excise Matters. Rule 9 of Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 and Rule 12 of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 held not ultra vires.
19 Jan 2015The petitioner, an advocate enrolled in the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a Public Interest Litigation in 2014 challenging an endorsement dated 2...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Corruption Case Against Customs Officers for Lack of Valid Sanction. Prosecution under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 fails as prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 of PC Act was mandatory for acts done in discharge of official duty.
29 Aug 2012The petitioners, nine customs officers, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Article 226 of the Constitution...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case. Principles of Unjust Enrichment Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Applicable to Refund Arising on Finalisation of Provisional Assessment.
20 Dec 2005The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai II appealed against the order of the appellate authorities below which allowed the refund claim of M/s. Sta...
- 80
