Search Results for "Corruption allegations"

1034 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1034 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Purushottam Raghunath Kulkarni, was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses CBI Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Solapur, dated 5th September 2000, acquitting the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha in Special Case No.3/1996 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeals Against Acquittal in Corruption Cases Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Trial Court's Acquittal Set Aside Due to Flawed Appreciation of Evidence and Misapplication of Law.

The judgment involves multiple criminal appeals and revision applications arising from the acquittal of government officials charged under the Prevent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Village Accountant Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Based on Alleged Demand and Acceptance of Bribe for Issuing Death Certificate Challenged for Lack of Proof of Demand.

Background: The matter pertained to a criminal appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the High Court of Karn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Conviction of EPFO Official for Bribery Under Prevention of Corruption Act; Validity of Sanction and Proof of Demand Analyzed. Court Considers Whether Sanction Order Was Granted After Proper Application of Mind and Whether Accused Actually Demanded the Bribe.

The appellant, a former Senior Social Security Assistant in the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), Regional Office, Bengaluru, was convicte...