Search Results for "Consolidation scheme"

147 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Cancellation of Revenue Entry in Fragmentation Case — Sale Deed Not Void Ab Initio. Revenue Authorities Cannot Cancel Entries After 17 Years Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Under Gujarat Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The petitioners, Kantibhai Bhagwanbhai Narola and others, purchased agricultural land bearing Revenue Survey No. 651 admeasuring 1 Acre 6 Gunthas and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Variation of Consolidation Scheme Under Section 32 of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1948 — Scheme Finalized in 1990 Cannot Be Varied After 29 Years Due to Laches and Lack of Jurisdiction.

The petitioners, Kisan Bhimrao Patil and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Exchange Dispute Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 — Exchange Deed Without Permission Void, But Voidable Only at Instance of Gaon Sabha or Land Holder

The appeals arise from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 5th July 2007 concerning a dispute over land rights under the Uttar Pradesh Zamind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Execution Order in Redemption Suit — Execution Court Has Power to Decide Nullity Objection. Decree Passed by Competent Court Is Not a Nullity and Execution Can Proceed.

The petitioner, original defendant No. 2 in a suit for redemption, challenged an order dated 17 August 2018 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restores Injunction in Land Dispute — Consolidation Scheme Error and Possession Report Justify Interim Protection. Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside as It Ignored Material Evidence of Possession and Acquisition.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with their possession over land bearing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Co-owner Injunction Dispute Under Fragmentation Act. Court upholds concurrent findings that plaintiff proved possession and defendant failed to show ouster, affirming injunction against co-owner.

The appellant, Namdeo Bhau Chavan, was the original defendant in a suit for injunction filed by respondent No.1, Shantabai Kundlika Chavan, who was th...