Search Results for "Consequential Circular"

725 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 725 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Catering Policy 2005 for Railway Minor Units. Petitioners Seek to Quash Policy and Extend Existing Licences Under Catering Policy 2000.

The petitions involved a challenge to the Catering Policy 2005 introduced by the Indian Railways for minor catering units at railway stations across v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract in Municipal Tender Dispute — Unilateral Termination Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Contract Termination Set Aside as Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., a partnership firm, was awarded a contract by the Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council for a projec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Directs University to Issue Mark-Sheet to Student Whose Admission Preceded Time-Limiting Circular. Court Holds Circular Imposing 8-Year Rule for B.E. Completion Not Applicable Retrospectively to Petitioners Admitted Before Its Issuance.

The petitioner, an engineering student, filed a writ petition seeking directions to Mumbai University and other respondents to issue his mark-sheet an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Municipal Employee Before Age 58 — Violation of Service Regulations. Compulsory retirement at age 55 without following Regulation 25(3) of BMC Service Regulations, 1989 set aside as arbitrary and illegal.

The Petitioner, Smt. Yashoda Bapu Jadhav, was an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was compulsorily retired at the ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Telecom Infrastructure Charges Case Over Retrospective Application. Appellant's Circular Increasing Charges from 2009 Held Invalid as Yearly Payments Are Made Upfront, Making Retrospective Burden Unreasonable Under Interconnection Agreements.

The dispute arose from appeals filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. challenging a judgment by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. Th...