Search Results for "Cheque signing power"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Cheque signing power"

94 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case, Holds Authorization to File Complaint Can Be Inferred from Conduct and Documents. The court set aside acquittal and convicted accused under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of cheque, holding that authorization of complainant's representative was sufficiently proved.

8 Feb 2024

The appellant, M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services Private Limited, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Prior Sale as Valid Despite Unregistered Deed. Subsequent Purchaser's Deed Declared Void Ab Initio Due to Notice of Earlier Sale Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

9 Jun 2022

The dispute pertains to a portion of land admeasuring 1.70 hectares out of Survey No.13/1 of village Shelavli, Palghar. The plaintiffs (Respondent Nos...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Complainant in Negotiable Instruments Act Case by Reversing High Court's Quashing of Cognizance. Authorized Representative's Complaint Held Competent Under Section 142 as Payee Company Filed Through Knowledgeable Manager, Despite Lack of Explicit Averments, Restoring Magistrate's Order.

22 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a cheque dishonour case under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant company, as payee, filed a complaint under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award on Share Sale Proceeds. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that petitioner signed mandate letter for sale of shares and loan repayment, rejecting allegations of fraud and forgery.

19 May 2020

The petitioner, Jackie Kukubhai Shroff, and the respondent, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, were shareholders in Atlas Equipfin Pvt. Ltd. (Atlas), which held shar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Wear and Tear Exclusion Not Applicable to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the insurer failed to prove that the bearing failure was due to wear and tear, and the breakdown was a fortuitous event covered under the Industrial All Risk Policy.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, was in the business of pesticides and chemicals. It purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE Packaged Power ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Policy Exclusion for Wear and Tear Does Not Apply to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the majority arbitrators' interpretation of the exclusion clause was plausible and not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE and obtained an Industrial All Risk Policy from the respondent, Uni...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Complainant in Cheque Bounce Case — Acquittal Upheld as Loan for Illegal Chit Fund Business Not Legally Enforceable. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Rebutted by Accused on Preponderance of Probabilities.

13 Apr 2015

The appellant, Rajendra Pangam, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Paresh B. Naik, al...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Patent Infringement Suit — Director's Authority to Sue Not Barred by Absence of Board Resolution at Plaint Stage. The court held that Order 29 Rule 1 CPC allows a director to sign and verify pleadings, and the absence of a board resolution is not a ground for rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC.

2 Sep 2014

The appellant, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the respondent, Celem S.A., in the District Court at Nashik seeking a declaratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Filed by Power of Attorney Holder Without Proper Authorization. Power of Attorney Holder Must Have Proper Authorization to File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

12 Aug 2005

The applicant, A.C. Narayanan, was the accused in multiple complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors and Officers in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Absence of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Requires Specific Averments of Role in Issuance of Cheque.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, including M/s. GIC Housing Finance Ltd. and its directors/officers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)