Search Results for "Cessed Building"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Employee Against MHADA for Withholding Terminal Benefits Due to Pending Criminal Proceedings. Court Holds That Absence of Enabling Rule and No Disciplinary Proceedings During Service Render Withholding Illegal.

The petitioner, Narayan G. Mahajan, retired as Executive Engineer from the Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) on 31.02.2011. His...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Letter of Intent for Cluster Redevelopment Under DCR 33(9) — No Violation of Tenant Rights Found. Petitioner's claim of illegalities in documents and failure to execute permanent alternate accommodation agreements rejected as premature and lacking merit.

The petitioner, Mr Murtuza Shabbir Tinwala, a resident and tenant in the Bhendi Bazaar Area, filed a Writ Petition challenging the Letter of Intent (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Petition Quashing MHADA Circular Imposing Additional Premium on Redevelopment. Circular dated 17-10-2007 held ultra vires and not applicable retrospectively to societies which had already obtained NOC, IOD, and Commencement Certificate.

The petitioner, Vishva-Villa Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, owned a plot o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...