Search Results for "Cenvat Credit Rules"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"CENVAT Credit Controversy: Bombay HC Upholds Order Under SVLDRS" Transparency and adherence to statutory timelines crucial for relief under legacy tax dispute schemes.

This case involves the petitioner, challenging an order under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS). The dispute primari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Resolves Key Issue on CENVAT Credit: Clarifying Inputs vs. Capital Goods" "Balancing Revenue and Industry Needs for a Robust Telecom Sector."

The Supreme Court addressed whether mobile service providers (MSPs) like Bharti Airtel can claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid for mobile towers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cenvat Credit Case — Clarificatory Amendment Retrospective. Removal of capital goods without use triggers credit reversal under Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The appellant, M/s. Betts India Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) confirming the demand for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.

The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MODVAT Credit Denial Under Rule 57C of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Final Products Not Eligible for Credit.

The petitioners, Atlas Automotive Components Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Credit Case for Residential Colony Services. Services for repair, maintenance and civil construction in factory residential colony are 'input service' under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai dated 4-12-2007, raising the qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise. Classification of plastic components under Chapter 39 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 upheld over Chapter 84.

The appellant, M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of plastic components used in textile machinery. The Commissioner of Cen...