Search Results for "CESTAT"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "CESTAT"

188 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 188 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue's Appeal in Modvat Credit Case — Capital Goods Used for Exempted Job Work Not Eligible for Credit Under Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. The court held that the use of capital goods for processing exempted goods on job work basis disentitles the assessee from Modvat credit, reversing the CESTAT order.

18 Feb 2013

The Commissioner of Central Excise appealed against the CESTAT order which had confirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside the Deputy Com...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Tax Appeal in Customs Duty Dispute — Installation of High Performance Liquid Chromatograph in Laboratory Attached to Factory Does Not Breach Condition No.6 of Notification No.110/95-Cus. Amendment by Notification No.42/98-Cus Widens Scope of 'Factory' and DGFT Regularisation Valid.

11 Mar 2026

The case involves a tax appeal by Atlas Dye Chem Industries against the Union of India and others, arising from a dispute over the import of High Perf...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Abatement Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Renders Proceedings Infructuous and Extinguishes Liability.

30 Sep 2024

The appellant, M/s Patanjali Foods Limited (formerly Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd), filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Agricultural Produce Market Committees in Service Tax Case on Exemption Grounds. The court upheld service tax liability for renting immovable property pre-01.07.2012, ruling that the activity was not a statutory duty under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 and exemption under Circular No.89/7/2006 does not apply.

23 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, addressed a group of appeals filed by various Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Agri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Confiscation and Penalties in Currency Seizure Case. Confiscation of USD 3,50,000 for Prior Visits Set Aside as Department Failed to Prove Illegal Export; Penalties Under Section 114 of Customs Act, 1962 Require Active Participation.

7 Jul 2014

The Commissioner of Customs (C.S.I. Airport), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the order dated 6 March ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Strict Compliance Required for Reduced Penalty Under Section 11AC. The benefit of 25% penalty is available only if duty, interest and reduced penalty are paid within 30 days of the original adjudication order, not the Tribunal's order.

25 Jun 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Without Pre-deposit in Classification Dispute — Tribunal's Discretion Must Be Exercised Consistently. Pre-deposit direction set aside as Tribunal failed to follow its own earlier order on identical issue under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962.

25 Nov 2010

The appellant, Videocon Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of LCD TVs, had been regularly importing Liquid Crystal Device – Thin Film Transistor Module...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Customs Duty Dispute Over Installation of High Performance Liquid Chromatograph Machine in Laboratory Attached to Factory. The court considered whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming the demand of duty despite regularisation by DGFT and amendment of notification widening the scope of 'factory'.

11 Mar 2026

The case involves a Tax Appeal filed by Atlas Dye Chem Industries against the Union of India and others, arising from a dispute over customs duty exem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)