Search Results for "CBEC circular"

45 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice and Retrospective Amendment to Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 — Upholds Validity of Officers' Powers and Amendment.

The petitioner, Sunil Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a show caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Service Tax Amendment on Renting of Immovable Property. The Court upheld the explanation to Section 65(105)(zzc) of the Finance Act, 1994 as clarificatory and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Chanakya Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to Be Identical, Indicating Non-Application of Mind by Adjudicating Authority.

The petitioner, a private limited company, challenged an assessment order dated 31 March 2023 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise. Classification of plastic components under Chapter 39 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 upheld over Chapter 84.

The appellant, M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of plastic components used in textile machinery. The Commissioner of Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Customs Authorities in Classification Dispute Over Imported Goods as High Speed Diesel. Goods Classified as Prohibited High Speed Diesel Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Leading to Confiscation and Penalties Under Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute centered on the classification of imported goods by three appellant companies, who declared them as Base Oil under Chapter Heading 2710196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Customs Classification Disputes Over LCD Panels. LCD Panels Classified Under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, Not as Parts of Television Sets or Car Audio Systems Under General Headings.

The appeals involved disputes over the customs classification of imported LCD panels by two assessees, M/s Videocon International and M/S Harman Inter...