Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act"

302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Reference to Mamlatdar for Tenancy Determination in Land Dispute. The court held that the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to decide tenancy issues and must refer them to the Mamlatdar under Section 58 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964.

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/02/2000 passed in Special Civil Suit No.108/1979, whereby the learned Judge ordere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petition Challenging Tenant Declaration Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act. Concurrent Findings of Tenancy Based on Landowner's Admission and Long-Standing Cultivation Upheld.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the landowners (petitioners) challenging the judgment and order of the Deputy Collector, L.Rs. Parbhani dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sale of New Tenure Land by Adivasi Requires Government Permission; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant, Shantaben Gopalbhai Tadvi, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent findings of fact by trial and appellate courts cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original defendant Shankar Mahada Kardile, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Patta Validity Requires Proof of Abandonment or Revocation of Earlier Patta Under Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a land title dispute in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents-plaintiffs (Shiv Nath and deceased Vishwana...