Search Results for "Bombay Motor Vehicles Rules"

315 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Classifying Motor-home Under CTH 87.02. Settlement Commission Has Jurisdiction to Interpret Tariff Classification Under Customs Act, 1962.

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28.07.2008 passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding. Deceased motorcyclist hit by tempo from behind; court holds tempo driver solely negligent, enhances compensation to Rs.2,58,44,336/- with 9% interest.

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Anil Yadav, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Established. Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 1,08,000 to Rs. 3,24,000 with 6% Interest.

The appellants, being the parents and minor brother of the deceased Jakir Tamboli, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Insurer of Truck held not liable as accident caused solely by bus driver's negligence, but insurer of bus liable to pay compensation with right to recover from owner.

The National Insurance Company Ltd. (appellant) filed two appeals against the judgment and order dated 18th February 2008 passed by the Motor Accident...