Search Results for "Bhaskaran case"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt and Notice Was Not Properly Served.

The revision petition was filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for dishonour of a ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies once cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.

The appellant, Nitin Bapurao Mankar, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Despite Separate Trials for Multiple Cheques. Dishonour of three cheques treated as separate offences under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, but separate trials not resulting in prejudice.

The dispute between the complainant Nilesh P. Salgaonkar and the accused Deelip Apte involved three cheques issued by the accused to the complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The present criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner, Sri R. Rajappa, challenging the judgment of conviction and order on senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Investment in Business Partnership Attracts Section 138 NI Act Liability Despite Dispute Over Debt Legality.

The appellant, Sheikh Shabbir, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vasco-da-Gama, acquitting the res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Hears Insurance Company's Appeals Against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Award; Disposition Not Indicated in Available Excerpts. The Tribunal Had Awarded Compensation for Death and Injuries Arising from a Rear-End Collision, Applying Principles from Sarala Verma and Pranay Sethi.

The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard four Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by United India Insurance Company Ltd. under Section 173 of the Mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 held to be in favour of complainant unless rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Sachin Food Processor, a registered partnership firm, filed a criminal complaint against the respondent, Sanjay T. Pathak, under Sectio...