Search Results for "Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act"

56 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Adverse Possession and Benami Transaction. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession, and the defendants established adverse possession for over 12 years, rejecting the claim of benami ownership under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.

7 Jan 2025

The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiffs (respondents) and the defendants (appellants) over 5.82 acres of land in Survey No. 211/1....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit, Restores Concurrent Findings of Trial and First Appellate Court. High Court's Reversal Set Aside for Reappreciating Evidence Beyond Second Appeal Scope Under Section 100 CPC.

17 Oct 2024

The case involves a dispute over possession of agricultural land. The plaintiff, Rajendra Kumar Gupta, filed a suit for recovery of possession based o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Offshore Drilling Companies Challenging Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notices Quashed for Being Time-Barred and Lacking Proper Sanction. Reassessment notices for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16 were issued beyond the four-year time limit under Section 149 without any allegation of failure to disclose material facts, and the sanction under Section 151 was granted without proper application of mind.

4 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Limited, Shelf Drilling J.T. Angel Limited, and Shelf Drilling Trident XII Limited, are companies incorp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Offshore Drilling Companies Challenging Reassessment Notices Under Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 147 Reassessment Invalid Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Condition Precedent. The court held that reassessment notices were issued without proper application of mind and without valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, and quashed the notices.

4 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Limited, Shelf Drilling J.T. Angel Limited, and Shelf Drilling Trident XII Limited, are companies incorp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Court Amin in Motor Vehicle Accident - Negligence and Liability of Insurer Upheld. Multiplier of 9 applied as per Sarla Verma; conventional heads enhanced as per Pranay Sethi.

25 Jul 2022

The appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the deceased M. Basavarajappa, who died in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 19.07.2007. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Apr 2022

The dispute pertains to a partition suit filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) seeking partition of ancestral property. The appellant, defend...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action Against All Defendants Including Those Alleged to Be Benami. The court held that allegations of sham and benami transactions in a suit for specific performance constitute a cause of action and cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

19 Jun 2021

The Appellants, original Plaintiffs, filed Suit No. 187 of 1993 seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 1st August 1985 in respect ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Will and Gift Deed Validity. Court sets aside concurrent findings of courts below, remands matter for fresh consideration on issue of due execution of gift deed and will.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Surekha Murgendra Kalyanshetti, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Kolhapur, which dismissed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)