Search Results for "Ban Imposition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Ban Imposition"

56 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Shikshan Sevak for Salary from Date of Appointment in Maharashtra Schools Act Case. Education Officer's Condition to Pay Salary from Date of Approval Quashed as Appointment Was Made After Following Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

12 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Vikas Pandit Patil, was appointed as Shikshan Sevak by Respondent No. 4 (Higher Education Society, Shirala) at Respondent No. 5 School...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Petitions of Candidates in Kerala Higher Judicial Service Recruitment — High Court's Imposition of Minimum Marks for Viva-Voce After Written Examination Held Arbitrary and Violative of Legitimate Expectation. The Court Applied the Doctrine of Substantive Legitimate Expectation and Article 14 to Quash the High Court's Decision, Directing Selection Based on Original Aggregate Marks Criteria.

11 Jul 2023

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by eleven candidates aspiring to be selected as District Judges...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Sand Mining Restriction Order in Favor of Lessee — Impugned Order Lacks Statutory Authority Under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994. The court held that the Deputy Director cannot impose a blanket ban on sand mining during monsoon based on environmental guidelines without specific rule provision.

12 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Sri. Fakkirappa M. Murgod, was granted a quarrying lease for ordinary sand for five years from 10 August 2017 under the Karnataka Mino...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

4 Dec 2019

The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Students' Petition Challenging College Dress Code Ban on Jeans and T-Shirts as Violative of Fundamental Rights. The Court Held That Imposition of a Particular Dress Code Without Providing Alternatives or Considering Students' Choice Infringes Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

6 Oct 2017

The petitioners, eight female students of a private college in Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the college's dress code which prohibited...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Telecom Tower Installation in Residential Area Under Section 419 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Municipal Corporation Cannot Refuse Permission Based on Unauthorized Policy Restricting Towers in Residential Zones. Held that the power to grant permission under Section 419 is quasi-judicial and must be exercised reasonably, and a blanket ban on telecom towers in residential areas is ultra vires the Act.

26 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Bharti Airtel Limited, a telecom service provider, sought permission from the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to install a teleco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceedings for Misconduct. Court holds that findings of domestic enquiry are not perverse and punishment is proportionate.

14 Aug 2006

The petitioner, TCE Consulting Engineers Ltd., challenged the order of the Industrial Court which set aside the dismissal of the first respondent, Dil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 106-B of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 Restricting Alcohol Content in Homoeopathic Medicines. The Court held that the rule is intra vires the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

28 Sep 2005

The Petitioner, Shrikrishna Homeo Pharmacy, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, carries on the business of manufactu...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)