Search Results for "BMC demolition"

71 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 71 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice in Slum Redevelopment Project. Corporation's Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Quashed for Non-Compliance with DCR 33(7) Prior Approval Requirement.

The petitioner, M/s Crescent Property Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Tenant Failed to Prove Permission for Construction and Suit Was Barred by Lack of Statutory Notice Under Section 527 of BMC Act.

The appellant, Shivashankar Swami, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court challenging a notice dated 5 July 1999 issued under Section 354A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Demolition by Municipal Corporation in Land Dispute Over Survey No.123, Hissa 1A. Appellants' Right to Reconstruction Upheld After Wrongful Demolition During Subsistence of Interim Order.

The case involves two appeals filed by Chotelal Ramkaran Yadav and Jaggu Chauthi Yadav against the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Tenants Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building. Court upholds eviction and demolition orders based on structural safety reports and compliance with statutory procedures under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 and Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976.

The petitioners, residents of Building No. 12 in Mathuradas Colony, Kalina, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petitions Against Railway Eviction Notices -- Residents of Malad Fail to Prove Legal Right to Railway Land -- Eviction Upheld for Public Infrastructure Development

The judgment involved 25 connected writ petitions filed by residents of Malad, Mumbai, against eviction notices from the Western Railway Administratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition in IOD Requiring Registered Agreement with Tenant for Redevelopment. Condition No.10 in IOD directing that registered agreement with existing tenant not be submitted before CC is set aside as arbitrary and contrary to DCR.

The Petitioner, MIG (Bandra) Realtors and Builders Pvt. Ltd., a developer, acquired redevelopment rights over land admeasuring approximately 20149.40 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of MMC Act — No Interim Relief for Unauthorized Structure Occupant. Tenancy Agreement from 1962 Does Not Confer Right to Continue Occupation After Notice Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The appellant, Michael Mascarenhas, filed an appeal challenging an order dated 30.07.2016 passed by the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, which reje...