Search Results for "BIR Act"

148 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal for Criminal Convictions Under Sections 148, 302, 307 IPC Supreme Court affirms convictions of three accused for murder and attempted murder, upholding life sentences based on the principles of common intention and evidence of injured witnesses.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by three accused challenging their conviction and life sentences under Sections 148, 302, and 307 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Section 138 NI Act Case Due to Non-Prosecution by Complainant's Partner. Complaint Filed by Partner Without Proper Authorization Not Maintainable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of acquittal passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai on 30/08/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Sections 302, 120-B r/w 34 IPC set aside as circumstantial evidence failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Akbar Khan Ajmer Khan and Akram @ Babalu Rafique Khan, were convicted by the Ad hoc District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Confirmation of Share Transfer in Wound-Up Company Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Evidence. Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 requires timely application and proof of bona fide transfer before winding up order.

The appellant, Rathnam P.V., filed an appeal against the order of the Company Judge dismissing his application under Section 536(2) of the Companies A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Premature Retirement of Pre-Nationalization Employee. Age of Superannuation of 60 Years Protected Under Section 14 of Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1995.

The petitioner, Wasant Sheshrao Kale, was a pre-nationalization employee of Model Mills, Nagpur, having joined as a Paid Learner Clerk on 29.5.1962 an...