Search Results for "BALCO"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Transfers Section 34 Petitions to Delhi High Court Following Designation of Seat of Arbitration as New Delhi. The Court held that once the seat of arbitration is designated, only courts where the seat is located have exclusive jurisdiction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court dealt with multiple transfer petitions and a civil appeal arising from orders passed by the Additional District Judge-cum-Presiding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Election Symbols Order and RP Act Provisions. Classification of Political Parties into Recognized and Unrecognized Held Valid Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Mr. Mrinall Shashi Shekhar Chakravorty, a social worker and businessman, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Policy for Air Vice Marshal Based on Seniority-cum-Merit. Air Commodore's Challenge Dismissed as Policy Valid and No Right to Promotion.

The appellant, Air Commodore Naveen Jain, was commissioned in the Indian Air Force in 1981 and promoted to Air Commodore in 2011. He was considered fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Fee Regulatory Committee's Determination in Telangana Professional College Fee Dispute. Court Sets Aside High Court's Re-determination of Fees for B.E./B.Tech Courses for Block Period 2016-2019, Upholding Expert Committee's Uniform Fee of Rs.97,000 per Student.

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a dispute over the fixation of fee structure for B.E. and B.Tech courses in private unaided professi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SRA Scheme for Lack of Public Interest. Court finds that the petition is not a genuine public interest litigation but is filed to further personal interests of the petitioner.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Mumbai Division of Maharashtra Machhimar Kruti Samiti, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...